Perceptions of Higher Education Professionals on the Utility of the Activities, Programs, or Policies Tool to Promote Self-Determination for College Students with Disabilities

Authors

Ashley Taconet, Postdoctoral Researcher, Center on Developmental Disabilities, University of Kansas

ORCID 0000-0003-2407-5114

Emily Tarconish, Teaching Assistant Professor, Special Education, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

ORCID 0000-0001-7434-180x

Joseph W. Madaus, Professor of Educational Psychology, Director of the Collaborative on Postsecondary Education and Disability, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut

ORCID 0000-0003-0248-0629

Nicholas Gelbar, Associate Research Professor, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut

ORCID 0000-0002-7734-2207

Lyman Dukes III, Professor of Special Education, College of Education, University of South Florida

ORCID 0000-0002-9308-6821

Michael Faggella-Luby, Professor of Special Education, College of Education, Texas Christian University

ORCID 0000-0002-9735-2293

Don Mills, Distinguished Professor of Higher Education Leadership (Retired), College of Education, Texas Christian University

ORCID

Abstract

Self-determination has been associated with academic success for college students with and without disabilities. The APP Tool was designed to allow higher education professionals to examine which campus Activities, Programs, or Policies (APPs) promote, and which might hinder, the development of student self-determination. This study used the qualitative basic interpretive approach (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016) to analyze data from semi-structured interviews of three focus groups of higher education professionals (practitioners) that were conducted to ascertain their impressions of the utility of the tool. Use of the APP Tool led practitioners to reflect on what self-determination included and what campus efforts were currently fostering these skills. Implications of the APP Tool included use as (1) a progress monitoring tool for student self-determination skills and (2) an evaluation tool for current campus programming.

Keywords: Self-determination, higher education, student affairs, students with disabilities, disability services, postsecondary education, focus group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59198/2477nsnros