Get Ahead of Bullying and Hate Speech, Says Education Expert

Protesters
Protesters attend a 2016 rally in Melbourne, Australia, in support of the Hands Off Safe School, designed as a resource for teachers and students to assist with issues of homophobia and bullying. (Photo by Chris Hopkins/Getty Images)

Editor’s Note: Loretta Waldman of UConn Today, the University of Connecticut’s news website, recently sat down for some Q&A with Brandi Simonsen, associate professor in the Neag School and co-director of the Center for Behavioral Education and Research. View the piece as it originally appeared on UConn Today.

A day after the November election, a teacher at a Michigan junior high school noticed two students lying on the ground before class. When asked what they are doing, they said they were forming a wall, as a joke. Later the same day, a larger group of students at the same school locked arms and prevented other students from passing in the hallway. “Let’s build a Wall,” they shouted, telling one Latina student she should go back to Mexico. Closer to home, anti-Semitic incidents at a school in Amherst, Mass. prompted the principal to schedule assemblies to address bullying, harassment, and anti-Semitism and, for a week, students engaged in a curriculum about the history of anti-Semitism. 

These incidents illustrate the dangerous effects of hate being modeled and reinforced on a national stage, according to a team of UConn school climate and behavior experts. Now spilling into classrooms and schools across the nation, these developments are presenting educators, parents, and communities with significant, immediate challenges as they seek to support students, while faced with their own feelings of stress, confusion, and lack of preparedness. 

The support being offered in the media focuses largely on how to respond when such an incident occurs, but a positive, proactive approach has been proven to be a far more effective strategy, says one of the experts, associate professor Brandi Simonsen. She and fellow faculty members George Sugai, Jennifer Freeman, and Tamika LaSalle at UConn’s Center for Behavioral Education and Research in the Neag School of Education recently authored a paper outlining empirically supported, high-impact practices that school leaders and educators must employ now to bolster school climates before incidents occur. More than 23,000 schools across the country have already implemented Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS) practices, says Simonsen, who is co-coordinator of the Northeast PBIS Network and a partner in the PBIS National Technical Assistance Center run by UConn, the University of Oregon, and the University of Missouri. In this interview with UConn Today, she explains why there should be more. 

Q. What is the current climate you are seeing in public schools around bullying and hate messages?

A. We don’t have clear and reliable national data to describe the number of incidents truly happening in schools, but we are hearing many anecdotal stories. For example, we’re seeing news media and social media reports of hate speech being written as vandalism in schools, we’re hearing about hate speech being used from student to student.

In addition to that, we are hearing reports – and again, we don’t have great national data to say how often or how many – about some students experiencing increases in anxiety or worry about the national scene. Kids are worried about deportation; students from lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families are worried about their family composition and what’s going to happen to them; and kids in different racial and cultural groups are concerned about how they are being treated and how they will be treated.

So we’re seeing these sorts of flare-ups of hate, and we’re also seeing these reactions of fear from students. Students say they are arriving at school anxious, upset, scared, stressed, or angry. While some students will successfully and productively move through their day, others display signs of withdrawal, anxiety, depression, or other mental health concerns. In addition, students may bring hurtful speech and actions into school, be on the receiving end of hurtful conduct, or be bystanders witnessing such disrespectful behavior.

Q. Have you seen an increase in these incidents in schools as a result of the 2016 election?

A. Incident reporting does seem to be increasing; however, we don’t know for sure whether the increases in incident reporting is caused by election results, heightened media exposure of specific incidents, increased reporting of incidents that have not been reported in the past, etc. Regardless of the prevalence rates, we have an obligation to be prepared to respond to and prevent future incidents of inappropriate behavior and victimization, which are unlikely to be totally eliminated. Although we can never prevent all possible types of events, doing nothing runs the risk of us being unprepared and sitting on our hands if students, teachers, and/or family members experience a serious incident.

“We have an obligation to be prepared to respond to and prevent future incidents of inappropriate behavior and victimization, which are unlikely to be totally eliminated.” Associate Professor Brandi Simonsen

Q. What prompted you and your colleagues to call for action now?

A. We’re worried that the recent stories could be the beginning of a more significant increase in these behaviors. We also know that schools often serve as the de-facto mental health support system for students. Providing all students with a safe, predictable, and positive environment is critical in effectively addressing many mental health concerns. Basic positive and proactive practices work. When these key practices are implemented well, students’ social and emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes improve. By implementing positive, proactive practices, schools can effectively support students who may experience greater difficulties and require additional support.

Q. What has been the general response so far at schools?

A. Most of the responses I see coming out in the media are just that – they’re focused on how to respond to bullying or other negative behaviors. In other words, they are reactive – waiting for the problem to show up, and then giving schools, families, or community members strategies to react. Traditionally, when schools react to problems, they resort to zero tolerance policies and different punishment strategies to try and decrease the problems. Those responses are typical and they have happened for decades. But the problem is that they miss the opportunity to be proactive and positive, and they may have negative, unintended consequences.

Q. What responses to bullying and hate speech work and don’t work?

A. As we look at the national landscape, schools have access to a really clear, systematic, and empirically validated approach to address problems like this. And so, rather than waiting for a problem to show up, we advocate that now is the time for schools to make sure a positive and proactive approach is applied across all students, staff, and sub-groups in the building, so that all kids both behave respectfully toward others and are respected by other students and by staff.

In classrooms and schools, there is clear evidence that when teachers implement positive and proactive practices, students benefit academically and socially. There is also clear evidence that in the absence of these practices, students engage in more disruptive behavior, which decreases teachers’ ability to teach. Disruptive behavior affects both the classroom process and academic outcomes, because teachers are losing instructional minutes to manage behavior. For individual students with more intense behavioral issues, these outcomes are magnified; kids who struggle with behavior experience the most reactive management and the least positive and proactive support, so it’s not surprising that they have some of the worst outcomes.

Q. Can you highlight the best practices that school leaders and educators can employ to head off bullying and hate speech?

A. Establish positively stated expectations that explicitly communicate respect for all students, and that value and embrace diversity among students as well as adults.

Clearly describe how students and adults can display observable expectations in each classroom routine and school setting that contribute to a common language and a predictable, respectful, and safe experience for all.

Explicitly and purposefully teach expectations across all classroom routines and school settings. Specifically define, model, and practice each expectation, and use positive and negative examples so that students see the line between appropriate and inappropriate behavior and actions. Also, teach students specific problem-solving strategies for instances in which they experience or see disrespectful behavior. Create a school-wide “stop signal” for disrespect, and teach students to use that signal to walk away from disrespectful acts.

Use data to monitor implementation, and screen for students who require more intensive support. Monitor how lessons are provided and how students respond to the behavior of their peers. Utilize school climate data to examine the experiences of groups of students who may be more personally affected by the national conversation, including students who identify as Muslim, Jewish, Black, Latino, or LGBTQ; have disabilities, a history of trauma, or mental health challenges; or represent other diverse backgrounds. Diversity is a positive quality; embracing and valuing diversity requires a safe, respectful environment, and a deliberate approach that supports all students, families, and staff members.

Q. Do educators play a role in reducing bullying not just within the walls of the school but beyond?

A. Educators, like any citizen, have a role within and outside the classroom to (a) model effective, prosocial behaviors that prevent occurrences and escalations of inappropriate behavior; (b) be an effective bystander by supporting victims or potential victims of inappropriate acts; (c) voicing opposition to hateful behavior; (d) encouraging students to be effective bystanders who support individuals who are being victimized; and (d) reinforcing and recognizing other individuals who display heroic non-discriminatory behavior and acts. Educators have a responsibility to inform family members about the prosocial skills that are being encouraged at school to maintain safe and respectful learning environments and reduce the likelihood of inappropriate behavior and acts.

Q. What role do parents and the community play?

A. I think many of the strategies we talk about in school make sense in families and communities. Parents and community leaders can communicate clear expectations and actively teach how to be respectful and kind to all others. They can draw on local examples from their families and communities, and they can identify what to do if someone is not respectful and kind. For example, my son is in kindergarten and my daughter is in preschool. We have this conversation regularly at our dinner table: We talk about how to be kind to others, and we also discuss what steps they can take if someone isn’t kind to them. Hopefully, that’s also happening at their schools, but it’s important that we talk about it at home to reinforce what they are learning, teach them to be kind, and help them be successful if something does come their way.

Access the original Q&A on UConn Today.

Neag School Announces Recipients of 2017 Alumni Awards

Alumni Awards 2017 Invitation Tree Image
The Neag School Alumni Awards Celebration will be held on March 18, 2017, on the UConn Storrs campus. Register online at s.uconn.edu/neagalumni2017.

The Neag School of Education and its Alumni Board are proud to announce the 2017 Neag School Alumni Award honorees. Six outstanding Neag School graduates will be recognized at the School’s 19th annual Alumni Awards Celebration in Storrs, Conn., on Saturday, March 18, 2017:

  • Outstanding School EducatorShamim S. Patwa ’97 MA, ’00 6th Year, ’03 Ph.D.
    A school psychologist for more than 15 years, Patwa joined Goodwin Elementary School at Mansfield (Conn.) Public Schools in 2013. There, she provides group and individual counseling sessions with an emphasis on problem-solving and conflict resolution, as well as social skills instruction, across all grades. Prior to joining Goodwin, she was an adjunct professor-in-residence of educational psychology at the Neag School of Education, where she taught doctoral and master’s level school psychology students.
  • Outstanding School AdministratorCarter Welch ’99 (ED), ’11 Ed.D., ’12 ELP
    As principal at Jerome Harrison Elementary School in North Branford (Conn.) Public Schools since 2014, Welch is responsible for instructional leadership; student learning and assessment; evaluation and professional learning; school climate and behavior; and parent and community involvement. Prior to leading the school, he served as the assistant principal at North Branford High School and has held various posts at North Branford Public Schools for eight years. Welch has also served as a coach and research affiliate with the National School Climate Center and an adjunct professor at Southern Connecticut State University.
  • Outstanding School SuperintendentAlan Addley ’07 ELP, ’14 Ed.D.
    For the past eight years, Addley has served as superintendent of schools for Granby (Conn.) Public Schools, where he is the chief executive officer for five schools and 2,000 students. Addley has put Granby on the map with initiatives such as professional learning communities, full-day kindergarten, and elementary world languages. Prior to that role, he served as the principal at Granby Memorial High School and has held various leadership posts at schools throughout Connecticut for 17 years. An avid community leader, Addley also serves as president of the Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents (CAPSS).
  • Outstanding ProfessionalAlan Kraut ’73 (ED)
    Kraut serves as the executive director of Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System (PCSAS), where he provides oversight and development of a new independent accreditation system for clinical psychology. Prior to that role, he was the executive director of the Association for Psychological Science (formerly American Psychological Society) for more than 25 years. Kraut also served in leadership roles for the American Psychological Association and was an assistant professor of psychology at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Outstanding Higher Education ProfessionalMaria D. Martinez ’83 MSW, ’96 Ph.D.
    Martinez is the assistant vice provost at UConn’s Institute for Student Success, where she has provided strategic and operational leadership for the past five years. Concurrently, she also serves as director of UConn’s Center for Academic Programs, where she has managed the daily operations of the TRIO Programs (Student Support Services, Upward Bound, and Talent Search) for the past 20 years.
  • Lifetime Achievement AwardMelvyn L. Reich ’69 Ph.D.
    Reich was a special education faculty member for the Neag School of Education for 22 years, and now a professor emeritus. Since his retirement from the University in 1992, he spent the next 25 years serving as director of special education programs in public and private schools in Connecticut, and later in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. During this same time, he continued to provide consulting services to a number of private and public organizations.

The Neag School Alumni Awards Celebration on March 18 begins at 5 p.m., followed by dinner at 5:30 p.m. Attire is business formal. No-host bar. The cost of the dinner is $50 per person.

Join us for the celebration on March 18. Register online at s.uconn.edu/neagalumni2017

Questions? Contact Caitlin Trinh, Neag School Alumni Relations Director, at 860.486.1202 or ctrinh@foundation.uconn.edu.

 

Related story: Neag School Celebrates 2016 Alumni Awardees

Schools Key to Solving Fake News Problem, Says Neag School Expert

Editor’s Note: This Q&A with Professor Donald Leu — written by Loretta Waldman — originally appeared on UConn Today, the University of Connecticut’s news website.

Fake news and questions about its role in the outcome of the 2016 election have thrust concerns about internet literacy to the forefront. It’s an issue Neag School of Education professor Donald Leu has been studying  for years; and the findings of a 10-year-old study he led demonstrating the inadequacies of classroom instruction in “new literacies” has been getting renewed attention.

Schoolchildren using computers
Neag School Professor Donald Leu says he believes that schools are the leverage point for solving the “fake news problem.” (Tetra Images – Erik Isakson/Getty Images)

The 2006 study, conducted by Leu and a team of researchers at Neag’s New Literacies Research Lab, asked 25 seventh-graders attending middle schools across Connecticut to review a website devoted to a fictitious endangered species, the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus. The results were troubling.

  • All 25 students fell for the internet hoax;
  • All but one of the 25 rated the site “very credible;”
  • Most struggled when asked to produce proof – or even clues – that the website was false;
  • Some students vehemently insisted the tree octopus really exists.

More recent research by the lab shows that little has changed in the ensuing decade, and the rise of fake news and online misinformation has given new urgency to confronting the problem. To head it off, schools must move quickly to make internet literacy a priority if they are to provide students with skills needed to evaluate online information critically, Leu says. In a recent interview with UConn Today, Leu shared his thoughts on the fake news phenomenon and some steps schools can take. Here are a few highlights.

Q. Why is internet literacy so important?

A. The internet is the most powerful tool we’ve ever had available to us in our lives. It will enable us to do great things, but it also leads us to catastrophes if we’re not careful. So we have to get on top of it in our schools to figure out appropriate policy and instruction. This business of fake news, that’s the catastrophe we’re headed for  if we’re not already there. Facts matter, yet it’s very easy for anyone to publish anything and they do. If we are going to take advantage of this incredible information source, we can go down one path or we can go down the other path. It’s incumbent on all of us to support changes in schools that enable us to prepare a generation of students who can take full advantage of the information and not be swayed by falsehoods.

“If I were going to invest in one thing, that’s where I would invest – giving teachers the instructional tools they can use to teach kids to think critically about online information. Teacher education programs need to start paying attention to this issue.”

Q. How does your Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus study inform what’s going on now?

A. It was over 10 years ago, and it was an attempt to try and highlight the nature of the problem. It’s not the only study – there have been others, too – so we have wasted 10 years.

I don’t necessarily like to use this term in public, but … we have a generation of digital natives who are also digital doofuses. They are natives when it comes to video, social networks, and texting, but they are doofuses when it comes to information. They do not know how to locate information or evaluate information, and they do not know how to communicate information in a richer context beyond text messaging.

Q. What is the current state of instruction around online literacy in schools?

A. It is hardly taught in schools. If you look at the reading standards, what we call the anchor standards – the eight central standards that all the grade-level standards are derived from – the words ‘internet’ or ‘digital’ or ‘online’ do not appear. And if you look at our assessments, our national assessment – the gold standard of reading assessments – it’s all offline reading tasks.

The basic problem is that our educational system has not been moving fast enough in this area. Library media specialists are being laid off. Those are the people who have the information and can share it with teachers, yet they are being laid off because they are seen as superfluous. These are people who know the online world and know how to teach critical evaluation skills, know how to teach kids how to locate things, but districts around the country are eliminating positions here to save money.

Q. Why is so little being done?  

A. There are so many reasons not to do this – the cost, the time, the lack of understanding, the tests that don’t represent this because everyone is teaching to the tests now. So there are so many reasons not to do this, but ultimately I believe it’s our schools that are the leverage point for solving this fake news problem. It’s not just news, it’s fake facts. You’ve got fake news, sure, but it’s also false information. So how do you judge the reliability of that source? That’s what we want our kids to be doing.

Q. Has the fake news phenomenon changed the conversation?

A. Fake news has gotten everyone’s attention. They understand it has consequences, and that we’re seeing those consequences and we’re seeing them now. But it’s not just on the right; we have fake news on the left, too, and the point is: Do you want a society that makes decisions based on facts not made-up stuff? So the light is shining now on that issue and providing some entry into the role schools can play, and it’s hugely important.

Q. How can schools get up to speed in a way that’s effective and that counters this influence?

A. There is no silver bullet. It’s complicated. We need to attack it on a number of levels. We need assessments that include this and we need additional professional development. If I were going to invest in one thing, that’s where I would invest – giving teachers the instructional tools they can use to teach kids to think critically about online information. Teacher education programs need to start paying attention to this issue. We need now, not 10 years from now, new teachers who are working this into the curriculum.

People are paying attention to the fake news, but what we do in our schools is what’s really important. That determines citizens who make thoughtful decisions at the ballot box, who are not swayed by propaganda or falsehoods on the right or left.

Access the original Q&A on UConn Today.

 

Related Story: Donald Leu on Solving the Challenge of Fake News